首页> 外文OA文献 >Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment
【2h】

Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment

机译:介绍sTamp方法在公路隧道安全评估中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

After the tremendous accidents in European road tunnels over the past decade, many risk assessment methods have been proposed worldwide, most of them based on Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA). Although QRAs are helpful to address physical aspects and facilities of tunnels, current approaches in the road tunnel field have limitations to model organizational aspects, software behavior and the adaptation of the tunnel system over time. This paper reviews the aforementioned limitations and highlights the need to enhance the safety assessment process of these critical infrastructures with a complementary approach that links the organizational factors to the operational and technical issues, analyze software behavior and models the dynamics of the tunnel system. To achieve this objective, this paper examines the scope for introducing a safety assessment method which is based on the systems thinking paradigm and draws upon the STAMP model. The method proposed is demonstrated through a case study of a tunnel ventilation system and the results show that it has the potential to identify scenarios that encompass both the technical system and the organizational structure. However, since the method does not provide quantitative estimations of risk, it is recommended to be used as a complementary approach to the traditional risk assessments rather than as an alternative. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
机译:在过去十年中欧洲公路隧道发生了巨大事故之后,全世界已经提出了许多风险评估方法,其中大多数基于定量风险评估(QRA)。尽管QRA有助于解决隧道的物理方面和设施,但目前在公路隧道领域中的方法在建模组织方面,软件行为以及隧道系统随时间推移的适应性方面存在局限性。本文回顾了上述局限性,并强调了需要通过一种补充方法来增强这些关键基础设施的安全评估过程,该补充方法将组织因素与运营和技术问题联系在一起,分析软件行为并为隧道系统的动力学建模。为了实现这一目标,本文探讨了基于系统思维范式并基于STAMP模型引入安全评估方法的范围。通过对隧道通风系统的案例研究证明了所提出的方法,结果表明该方法具有识别涵盖技术系统和组织结构的方案的潜力。但是,由于该方法不能提供风险的定量估计,因此建议将其用作传统风险评估的补充方法,而不是替代方法。 ©2012爱思唯尔有限公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号